Our Services

  • Your team knows how to analyze the past—that's what museum training teaches. But when it comes to planning, you're often stuck choosing between wishful thinking and worst-case scenarios. Neither helps you make decisions about programs to launch, partnerships to pursue, or infrastructure to invest in when you can't predict what next year will bring.

    Futures literacy is the capacity to hold multiple possible tomorrows in your mind at once and use them as decision-making tools. Think of it like learning to read music—suddenly patterns become visible that were always there but you couldn't perceive. A futures-literate team can look at a community demographic shift and see not just threat or opportunity, but a spectrum of possible responses depending on which future unfolds.

    This multi-session training program works with your leadership team or planning committee over several months. We introduce practical methodologies: signal spotting (noticing early indicators of change before they're obvious), speculative design (making future possibilities tangible so you can test them), and scenario exploration (developing multiple plausible futures instead of one "strategic plan"). Between sessions, you practice these tools on real decisions your museum faces.

    The goal isn't prediction—it's building reflexes for navigating uncertainty. After this training, your strategic planning meetings generate options you couldn't see before. Your team can evaluate a new program idea by asking "which futures does this prepare us for?" instead of "will this work?" You develop shared language for discussing change that goes beyond optimism and pessimism.

    What you'll gain: Your team will be able to identify emerging patterns in your community before they become crises, generate multiple strategic options instead of feeling stuck with one path, evaluate decisions through multiple future scenarios, and communicate about change without defaulting to either anxiety or denial.

    Right for you if: Your strategic planning feels reactive rather than generative, your team gets stuck in "this or that" thinking when facing complex decisions, or you need practical tools for navigating uncertainty without pretending you can predict the future.

  • Conference presentations often leave you inspired but unchanged—you return to your desk Monday morning with the same constraints you left with Friday. These talks aim for something different: giving audiences experiential tastes of futures methodologies they can immediately apply, not just information to file away.

    The presentations balance provocation with accessibility. I draw on research showing how museums are already being reshaped by climate change, economic pressures, and decolonization efforts—not as abstract future threats but current operational realities many in the audience already navigate. Then we explore how futures thinking provides practical tools for responding to these forces.

    Rather than just describing methodologies, the talks often include brief interactive elements where audiences practice futures thinking on real scenarios: "Your city just announced major demographic shifts—let's spend three minutes imagining three different museum responses." These micro-experiences show how the work actually feels, demystifying approaches that might otherwise seem inaccessible.

    The goal isn't leaving people with answers but equipping them with better questions to take back to their teams. What assumptions are embedded in our current practices? Which futures are we preparing for, consciously or not? How might we imagine differently together?

    These talks work for annual meetings, regional conferences, professional network gatherings, or institutional retreats. They can focus on specific methodologies (design fiction, speculative design, scenario exploration) or broader themes around institutional transformation, imagination as professional capacity, or futures thinking as survival skill in uncertain times.

    What audiences gain: Introduction to futures methodologies that feel practical rather than theoretical, permission to imagine radical alternatives alongside incremental improvements, concrete examples of how other museums use futures thinking, and renewed energy for the possibility of institutional transformation.

    Right for your event if: You want presentations that transform how people think, not just what they know, your audience needs practical tools for navigating uncertainty, or you're looking for speakers who can balance intellectual substance with accessibility and engagement.

  • Museum studies programs teach research methods, collection management, exhibition development—the mechanics of how museums currently work. But students graduate into a field undergoing fundamental transformation, often without methodologies for imagining institutions that don't exist yet.

    These multi-week teaching residencies bring futures thinking into your museum studies or design program as legitimate scholarly practice, not just creative speculation. Students learn to treat "what if" as a research method alongside "what was" and "what is."

    I work with faculty to develop curriculum that integrates futures methodologies into existing courses—not as an add-on elective but woven through the program. In exhibition design, students might prototype labels for post-climate museums. In collections management, they might explore stewardship practices for post-colonial institutions. The work combines academic rigor with speculative imagination.

    Student projects push against current constraints: What would museums look like if admission was free and funded differently? How would interpretation change if exhibits were co-created with communities from conception? Students present these speculations using design fiction, scenario narratives, and prototypes that make imagined futures tangible for critique.

    The pedagogy models holding critique and imagination in balance. Students analyze what's broken about current practice AND envision what transformed practice might become. They graduate not just understanding museums as they are, but capable of articulating and building museums as they could be.

    What students gain: Methodologies for imagining institutional alternatives, capacity to articulate visions of transformation in compelling ways, portfolio projects that demonstrate futures thinking alongside traditional skills, and confidence that their generation can reshape rather than just inherit museum practice.

    Right for your program if: You want students to graduate as change-makers not just job-seekers, you're open to integrating speculative methods into existing courses, or you see futures literacy as essential capacity for the next generation of museum professionals.

Consulting about the museum field

Right for you if

  • you're building something for museums but aren't sure how they'll receive it,

  • need to understand museum decision-making for your research or work,

  • or want to partner with museums but keep hitting mysterious barriers.

  • you're developing a product for museums, pitching a partnership, designing for cultural spaces, researching the sector—but museums operate by their own logic.

    We speak the language fluently and can help you navigate it.

This service is for anyone working adjacent to museums who needs an insider's perspective: technology companies building tools for cultural institutions, designers creating for museum contexts, researchers studying the field, consultants developing museum-focused offerings, funders evaluating grant proposals, or organizations seeking museum partnerships.

Museums have unique constraints most outsiders don't see: governance structures where boards hold power but staff hold knowledge, mission-driven decisions that override market logic, audiences ranging from school groups to scholars, collections that legally can't be monetized, and institutional cultures shaped by decades (or centuries) of practice. Understanding these dynamics is the difference between a partnership that works and one that frustrates everyone involved.

We can provide the museum perspective you need—whether that's reviewing your pitch deck through a museum professional’s eyes, identifying which institutions are good matches for your work, explaining why museums make decisions that seem irrational from a business standpoint, or helping you speak the field's language in ways that build trust rather than trigger skepticism.

This consulting works as single-session guidance, ongoing advisory relationships, or project-based support depending on your needs. You get clarity on how museums actually function, not how organizational charts say they should.